Though not being communicated, the accelerating data looks like the state of the climate is set up for feedback runaway global climate change.

​​Runaway climate change is not a scientific recognized term, but it is by far the greatest danger of global warming. A runaway state is the result of greater climate change (locked in) commitment, plus many amplifying feedbacks that are 
caused (triggered) by global warming

If planetary feedback emissions are increasing to the extent of driving the increasing atmospheric GHG levels faster, for policy making we should consider that a state of committed climate change runaway exists (or at least an extreme zero tolerance risk exists). A sudden jump or accelerating global temperature increase at the same time makes the situation more definite. 

The situation in which 'runaway' generally used in the science is the runaway greenhouse effect which results in a dead planet and applies to Venus.  The situation of 'runaway' climate change in the science is ​'runaway carbon dynamics' and this is only ​to be found in the IPCC 2001 3rd assessment under 'large scale singularities' (above). It is not included in the 2014 IPCC 5th assessment. Runaway carbon dynamics means amplifying carbon feedbacks of CO2 and methane from the heated up planet, or weakening of the land or ocean carbon sinks. However feedback emissions of nitrous oxide are also caused by global warming, so the more complete term would be runaway GHG dynamics.   

An Oct 2005 presentation (at Yale) by the IPCC Chair R Pachauri included 'runaway​ carbon dynamics' in a list of singular events. 

'​​Instances of possible singular events
• Breakdown of the thermohaline circulation
• Disintegration of the West Antarctic ice sheet
• Shift in mean climate towards an El Nino like state
Runaway carbon dynamics - reduced sink capacity, release of methane from             hydrates, carbon from permafrost
• Rearrangement of biome distribution
​Such events can overwhelm our response strategies'

​​From the very start the big concern about global warming has been the   possibility of a 'runaway' global warming and climate change. 

'Runaway' (self accelerating) global heating and climate change is the planetary tipping point of many tipping points combined and in the case of the many Arctic amplification tipping points are self and inter reinforcing​​. Ultimate vicious cycles. 

This is the greatest single danger from global warming to the survival of humanity and also the survival of potentially almost all life on the planet. With all climate and ocean indicators accelerating (2016) humanity and life are in extreme peril  from runaway.

​​​​A global heating feedback event wiping almost most life we know is possible- because it happened 250 million years ago in the
End Permian extinction event and 55 million years ago with the Paleocene-Eocene thermal maximum (PETM). Current research confirms both of these extinction events were driven by very large emissions of carbon to the atmosphere.

​​The PETM is the closest distant past analog to our GHG emissions global warming situation today. Research published October 2013 by Morgan Schaller and James Wright leads to their definite finding that following a doubling in carbon dioxide levels, the surface of the ocean turned acidic over a period of weeks or months and global temperatures rose by 5 degrees centigrade – all in the space of about 13 years. Scientists had previously thought this process happened over 10,000 years.

These mass extinction events involve the emission of an enormous emission of carbon as CO2 and methane. In the Arctic several times atmospheric methane is stored frozen in permafrost and subsea floor frozen solid methane gas hydrate.  The permafrost is thawing as the Arctic temperature rapidly increases (Arctic amplification). Arctic methane hydrate is destabilizing in at least three locations, mainly a process that has been going on for a long time, but that ocean warming will make worse.  

It is or should be treated as a zero tolerance risk applied to the very long time frame into the future.​​

Right now we are in a very high risk of committed runaway situation, meaning we are committing ourselves and all life to a rapid accelerating global heating that we could not possibly change. James Hansen has been warming about this for many years.

Runaway results from the combination of multiple triggered amplifying large feedbacks and climate change commitment. ​​

Runaway includes methane feedback emissions- especially the enormous stores of Arctic carbon as methane emitters. Carbon dioxide and nitrous oxide feedback GHG sources are also huge. In runaway all three would be self reinforcing and accelerating.  

Methane has a global warming effect of 86X CO2 for 20 years after emissions. ​​​​

Methane having increased two and a half times since industrialization stalled in 200 but since 2006 it has been on a renewed sustained increase- and the scientists this increase is due to planetary methane feedback emissions. The methane they think is coming from warming tropical and subartic wetland peat. ​​

It seems most of the methane is being emitted from warming tropical wetland but the largest increase is from Far North wetland peat. ​​

The highest atmospheric methane on then planet is recorded at Lac La Biche Alberta right on the southern edge of Canada's vast wetlands.​​

This use of the world runaway is not a scientific term but the basis in science is definite.

​​This 'runaway' means the situation caused by positive (bad)  feedbacks in which global warming accelerates the rate of global warming totally beyond any capacity of human control.

​​When describing this situation the scientists may use the terms of rapid global warming and abrupt global climate change.

​​Tipping points, irreversible impacts,
and singularities are also scientific terms that apply​​.

James Hansen says Runaway greenhouse effect" has several meanings ranging from, at the low end, global warming sufficient to induce out-of-control amplifying feedbacks such as ice sheet disintegration and melting of methane hydrates, to, at the high end, a Venus-like hothouse with crustal carbon baked into the atmosphere and surface temperature of several hundred degrees. Between these extremes is the "moist greenhouse", which occurs if the climate forcing is large enough to make H2O a major atmospheric constituent (Kasting, 1988). In principle, an extreme moist greenhouse might cause an instability with water vapor preventing radiation to space of all absorbed solar energy, resulting in very high surface temperature and evaporation of the ocean (Ingersoll, 1969). Our simulations indicate that no plausible human-made greenhouse gas forcing can cause an instability and runaway greenhouse effect as defined by Ingersoll (1969), Sept 2001​​ Climate Sensitivity, Sea Level, and Atmospheric CO2.

​​The runaway climate change that we're talking about result from multiple Arctic positive feedbacks. We are talking about methane which is 72 times more powerful as a global warming greenhouse gas than CO2 over a 20 period. In the case a large sustained methane emission from the Arctic the methane has 100 times the effect of CO2 over a 10 year time frame.

The runaway Arctic +ve feedbacks​​​​​​​​​​​​​​
  • Loss of Arctic snow and summer sea ice cooling albedo
  • ​Methane emissions from warming sub Arctic peat rich wetlands 
  • ​Methane and carbon dioxide emissions and from thawing permafrost 
  • Nitrous oxide emissions from thawing permafrost 
  • Methane emissions from sub sea floor frozen solid methane gas hydrate
​​Each one of these is a powerful positive feedback in increasing the rate of global warming, as well as of course Arctic warming. 

Because they all occur in the same region of the Arctic, they will each reinforce all the others, a domino effect called cascading feedbacks. 

The Arctic warms more rapidly than the rest of the planet. (Arctic polar amplification)​​. 

The Arctic summer sea ice is collapsing past its tipping since 2007. ​​

The rapidly warming Arctic is already emitting methane from all the above sources.​​ As global warming is committed to increase and Arctic warming increases faster, we are now in a runaway planetary emergency situation. 

The Health and Human Rights Approach to Climate Change
Feb 2017 dynamics of runaway global warming explained (2017 B. Parker page 15)

IPCC 3rd assessment on runaway IPCC TAR 2001 ​​Ch 19  Large-Scale Singularities Runaway carbon dynamic. ). These (Arctic) changes will have cascading effects on key regional bio-physical systems and cause global climatic feedbacks (IPCC 2001 Ch. 15

IPCC 2007 4th assessment
 ​Arctic ​Surface albedo is projected to decrease ... higher methane emissions responding to the thawing of permafrost and an overall increase in wetlands will enhance radiative forcing ​(AR4 2007 WGII Chapter 15: Polar Regions)
This is a good definition of runaway from a 2018 paper 
Self-reinforcing feedbacks could push the Earth System toward a planetary threshold that, if crossed, could prevent stabilization of the climate at intermediate temperature rises and cause continued warming on a “Hothouse Earth” pathway even as human emissions are reduced.
This paper warns that 'warming could activate important tipping elements (12, 17), raising the temperature further to activate other tipping elements in a domino-like cascade that could take the Earth System to even higher temperatures (Tipping Cascades)'. Even if the Paris Accord target of a 1.5 °C to 2.0 °C rise in temperature is met, we cannot exclude the risk that a cascade of feedbacks could push the Earth System irreversibly onto a “Hothouse Earth” pathway.' As we are committed to 2C without immediate rapid global emissions decline we are now at a point of runaway extreme  risk. 

This NOT the 'runaway greenhouse effect" dead planet like Venus. Runaway is worst End the world climate change scenario, and not a popular thing to investigate. It based on high degrees of committed future warming, that have the future potential to cause increasing emissions from large (previously) quiescent pools of carbon. It is GHGas runaway- multiple self and inter-reinforcing GHG emissions that have been safely balanced (carbon cycle) cold (subarctic wetlands) or frozen solid(Arctic frozen soil permafrost). Arctic warming from global warming is self amplifying due to melting summer sea ice losing ice 'albedo' cooling effect. 

UN Sec. General Sept. 2018 If we do not change course by 2020, we risk missing the point where we can avoid runaway climate change. Though the IPCC reports multiple Arctic feedback sources it does not recognize runaway  

Arctic Global Linkages March 2019 UN
​The rapidly warming arctic is already emitting methane (more than assumed) , CO2 (more than assumed) and nitrous oxide emissions (more than assumed). Methane is 86X as powerful as CO2 and nitrous oxide 290X as powerful 
'Runaway climate change' here is the result of the known multiple self and inter-reinforcing amplifying feed-backs caused by global warming beyond the control of mitigation and cannot be adapted to.  It is NOT the end of all life  'runaway greenhouse effect', a science term  (2012 paper). A recent paper addresses multiple feedbacks and tipping points acting in concert to a different Hothouse Earth state, which would be runaway.
2018 Hothouse runaway Earth paper: 2C trigger
Dec 2019 Charles Rhodes In Thermal Runaway 
by date​

12 Nov 2020 ​​An earth system model shows self-sustained melting of permafrost even if all man-made GHG emissions stop in 2020

27 Nov 2019 ​​Climate tipping points — too risky to bet against
The growing threat of abrupt and irreversible climate changes must compel political and economic action on emissions

28 Nov 2013 ​​Continued global warming after CO2
emissions stoppage

​​30 Nov 2016
Quantifying global soil carbon losses in response to warming (massive)

VIDEO On 25 June 2020 the UN Climate Secretariat put out a warning on Twitter "To avoid run-away climate change we act now". 
Runaway climate change is rarely mentioned by climate change assessments. Several large sources of feedback  emissions are recognized (IPCC 2014 AR5),and tipping points. The combined effect of multiple feedbacks or tipping points  acting in concert is not addressed.  The scientists use the term 'beyond the point of no return', but this is not in the assessments.